A review of the prescribing trend of thiazide-type and thiazide-like diuretics in hypertension: A UK perspective.

Thiazide diuretics have been the cornerstone of hypertension treatment for >5 decades. Most recent European and American guidelines recommend both thiazide-type and thiazide-like diuretics as first-line drugs for all patients with hypertension. In contrast, diuretics are not regarded as first-line treatment in the UK and in patients who are to be initiated on a diuretic treatment, thiazide-like molecules, such as chlortalidone and indapamide are the preferred option. This review examines the prescribing trend of the 4 most commonly prescribed thiazide diuretics for the treatment of hypertension in the UK. Prescription cost analysis data were obtained for both 2010 and 2016/2017 for each region of the UK to analyse the impact of the 2011 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence hypertension guidelines on the trend in thiazide diuretic prescribing. Overall, the prescriptions of thiazide diuretics declined over the years. Bendroflumethiazide is the most commonly prescribed diuretic in the UK and despite some geographical differences, thiazide-type diuretics are more widely used than thiazide-like. The use of indapamide increased significantly between 2010 and 2016/2017 while chlortalidone was rarely employed. Of the many factors affecting trends in prescriptions, clinical inertia, treatment adherence, availability of the products and the lack of fixed dose combinations may play a role.

The effect of indapamide vs. bendroflumethiazide for primary hypertension: a systematic review.

The aims of the current review were to compare the efficacy of monotherapy with bendroflumethiazide vs. indapamide on mortality, cardiovascular outcomes, blood pressure, need for intensification of treatment and treatment withdrawal. Two authors independently screened the results of a literature search, assessed the risk of bias and extracted relevant data. Randomized clinical trials of hypertensive patients of at least a 1-year duration were included. When there was disagreement, a third reviewer was consulted. Risk ratio (RR) and mean differences were used as measures of effect. Two trials comparing bendroflumethiazide against placebo, one comparing indapamide with placebo and three of short duration directly comparing indapamide and Bendroflumethiazide, were included. No statistically significant difference was found between indapamide and bendroflumethiazide for all deaths [RR 0.82; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57, 1.18], cardiovascular deaths (RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.55, 1.20), noncardiovascular deaths (0.81; 95% CI 0.54, 1.22), coronary events (RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.30, 1.79) or all cardiovascular events (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.67, 1.18). Indapamide performed worse for stroke (RR 2.21; 95% CI 1.19, 4.11), even though a reduction in RR compared with placebo was observed in both groups. There was no statistically or clinically significant difference between indapamide and bendroflumethiazide in blood pressure reduction (mean absolute difference <1 mmHg). The present review highlights a lack of studies to answer the review question but also a lack of evidence of superiority of one drug over the other. Therefore, there is a clear need for new studies directly comparing the effect of these drugs on the outcomes of interest.

Should we switch from bendrofluazide to chlorthalidone as the initial treatment for hypertension? A review of the available medication.

INTRODUCTION Thiazide diuretics are commonly prescribed in the treatment of hypertension. However, thiazide diuretics may not all be equal in their ability to reduce cardiovascular disease outcomes. AIM To determine if bendroflumethiazide/bendrofluazide, the most commonly used diuretic for hypertension in New Zealand, is as effective as other diuretics in terms of cardiovascular disease outcomes. METHODS Using recent reviews of thiazide-like (chlorthalidone or indapamide) and thiazide-type diuretics (hydrochlorothiazide and bendrofluazide) and a separate search of bendrofluazide, data on cardiovascular disease outcomes was extracted. RESULTS Nineteen relevant papers with 21 comparisons were found. All thiazide-based diuretics have been reported in at least one trial showing them to be more effective than placebo for cardiovascular disease outcomes, with the exception of chlorothiazide. There were no comparisons of bendrofluazide alone with other medications, but there were two studies with either bendrofluazide or hydrochlorothiazide compared with ß-blockers; however, the pooled relative risk (RR) was not significant (RR = 1.10 (95% CI, 0.84-1.43)). For chlorthalidone, there were four comparisons with other medications, and the summary RR was statistically significant for cardiovascular disease outcomes (RR = 0.91 (95% CI, 0.85-0.98)). Chlorthalidone was significantly more effective for some cardiovascular disease outcomes when compared with doxazosin, amlodipine and lisinopril. CONCLUSIONS All thiazide-based medicines available in New Zealand are effective in terms of cardiovascular disease outcomes compared with placebo when used for treating hypertension, with the exception of chlorothiazide. Of the diuretics available in New Zealand for hypertension, only chlorthalidone has been shown to be more effective than other blood pressure-lowering medicines. It may be time to change from using bendrofluazide and start using chlorthalidone as a treatment for hypertension.

Bayesian sample sizes for exploratory clinical trials comparing multiple experimental treatments with a control.

In this paper, a Bayesian approach is developed for simultaneously comparing multiple experimental treatments with a common control treatment in an exploratory clinical trial. The sample size is set to ensure that, at the end of the study, there will be at least one treatment for which the investigators have a strong belief that it is better than control, or else they have a strong belief that none of the experimental treatments are substantially better than control. This criterion bears a direct relationship with conventional frequentist power requirements, while allowing prior opinion to feature in the analysis with a consequent reduction in sample size. If it is concluded that at least one of the experimental treatments shows promise, then it is envisaged that one or more of these promising treatments will be developed further in a definitive phase III trial. The approach is developed in the context of normally distributed responses sharing a common standard deviation regardless of treatment. To begin with, the standard deviation will be assumed known when the sample size is calculated. The final analysis will not rely upon this assumption, although the intended properties of the design may not be achieved if the anticipated standard deviation turns out to be inappropriate. Methods that formally allow for uncertainty about the standard deviation, expressed in the form of a Bayesian prior, are then explored. Illustrations of the sample sizes computed from the new method are presented, and comparisons are made with frequentist methods devised for the same situation.

Aortic remodelling following the treatment and regression of hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.

BACKGROUND: Increased arterial stiffness independently predicts adverse prognosis. While different antihypertensive strategies produce different magnitudes of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) regression, there are no comparative data on how these strategies affect arterial stiffness. The aim was to determine the longitudinal change in aortic stiffness following the treatment of essential hypertension with two mechanistically different antihypertensive treatment strategies. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-two patients with essential hypertension and CMR confirmed with LVH were randomly assigned to antihypertensive regimes for 6 months. Treatment strategies were designed either to inhibit the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) (valsartan and moxonidine, group VM) or to have neutral effect on these systems (bendroflumethiazide and amlodipine, group BA). Both treatment groups underwent identical baseline and a 6-month follow-up CMR and were compared with a healthy age-matched control group. Baseline aortic distensibility (AD) was lower in both hypertensive groups compared with controls (2.8 × 10(-3 )mmHg(-1) in group VM (p = 0.001) and 3.3 × 10(-3 )mmHg(-1) group BA (p = 0.039) compared with 4.5 × 10(-3 )mmHg(-1) in the control group). AD increased after antihypertensive therapy (VM: 2.8 × 10(-3 )mmHg(-1)-4.2 × 10(-3 )mmHg(-1) (p = 0.001); BA 3.3 × 10(-3 )mmHg(-1)-4.6 × 10(-3 )mmHg(-1) (p < 0.01)). In both treatment groups AD returned to a level comparable with the normal control group (p = 0.81) after 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with essential hypertension and LVH, AD was lower than in matched normal controls. Despite the opposing pharmacological mechanisms utilised across the treatment groups, the improvement in AD was similar, suggesting that blood pressure reduction per se may be more important than RAAS and SNS inhibition for the improvement of aortic remodelling.

Long-term antihypertensive treatment fails to improve E/e' despite regression of left ventricular mass: an Anglo-Scandinavian cardiac outcomes trial substudy.

Antihypertensive treatment can improve tissue Doppler indices of left ventricular diastolic function in the short term, but little is known about the longer-term effect of different antihypertensive treatments on progression of left ventricular diastolic function and left ventricular hypertrophy. We hypothesized that long-term treatment of hypertension will lead to improvements in left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic function. We collected detailed cardiovascular phenotypic data on 1006 participants from a substudy of the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial. Patients randomized to either an amlodipine±perindopril-based or an atenolol±bendroflumethiazide-based regimen underwent conventional and tissue Doppler echocardiography at time of control of blood pressure after randomization (≈1.5 years; phase 1) and after a further 2 years of antihypertensive treatment (phase 2). There were no prerandomization data. Five hundred thirty-six patients had complete data collection at both phases. Left ventricular mass index regressed from phase 1 to 2 with no significant difference between treatment groups (amlodipine: 119.5-116.8; atenolol: 122.9-117.5; P<0.001 for both). Conversely, tissue Doppler diastolic indices did not change in the amlodipine±perindopril-based regimen (E/e', 7.5-7.6 cm/s; P=not significant), but deteriorated in the atenolol±bendroflumethiazide-based regimen (E/e', 8.0-8.5 cm/s; P<0.01). Despite regression of left ventricular hypertrophy, there was no associated improvement in diastolic function. In fact, long-term treatment with atenolol±bendroflumethiazide resulted in a progressive deterioration in E/e'. This may be a factor contributing to the previously described worse clinical outcome in patients treated with atenolol±bendroflumethiazide compared with amlodipine±perindopril.

Meta-analysis of dose-response relationships for hydrochlorothiazide, chlorthalidone, and bendroflumethiazide on blood pressure, serum potassium, and urate.

Thiazide and thiazide-like diuretics are widely used in the management of hypertension, but recently the equivalence of hydrochlorothiazide and chlorthalidone for blood pressure (BP) lowering and prevention of cardiovascular disease has been questioned. We performed a meta-analysis to characterize the dose-response relationships for 3 commonly prescribed thiazide diuretics, hydrochlorothiazide, chlorthalidone, and bendroflumethiazide, on BP, serum potassium, and urate. Randomized, double-blind, parallel placebo-controlled trials meeting the following criteria, ≥ 2 different monotherapy dose arms, follow-up duration ≥ 4 weeks, and baseline washout of medication ≥ 2 weeks, were identified using Embase (1980-2010 week 50), Medline (1950-2010 November week 3), metaRegister of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Central. A total of 26 trials examined hydrochlorothiazide, 3 examined chlorthalidone, and 1 examined bendroflumethiazide. Studies included a total of 4683 subjects in >53 comparison arms. Meta-regression of the effect of thiazides on systolic BP showed a log-linear relationship with a potency series: bendroflumethiazide>chlorthalidone>hydrochlorothiazide. The estimated dose of each drug predicted to reduce systolic BP by 10 mm Hg was 1.4, 8.6, and 26.4 mg, respectively, and there was no evidence of a difference in maximum reduction of systolic BP by high doses of different thiazides. Potency series for diastolic BP, serum potassium, and urate were similar to those seen for systolic BP. Hydrochlorothiazide, chlorthalidone, and bendroflumethiazide have markedly different potency. This may account for differences in the antihypertensive effect between hydrochlorothiazide and chlorthalidone using standard dose ranges.

Effect of Irbesartan treatment on plasma and urinary markers of protein damage in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria.

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the angiotensin II receptor blocker Irbesartan on protein damage by glycation, oxidation and nitration in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria. In a double-masked randomised crossover trial of 52 hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients, antihypertensive treatment was replaced with bendroflumethiazide. After 2-months wash-out, patients were treated randomly with Irbesartan 300, 600, and 900 mg o.d., each dose for 2 months in a three-way crossover study. Glycation, oxidation and nitration adduct residues in plasma protein and related urinary free adducts were determined by stable isotopic dilution analysis liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Treatment with Irbesartan decreased urinary excretion of advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs)--methylglyoxal- and glyoxal-derived hydroimidazolones, MG-H1 and G-H1. Urinary AGEs were decreased by 30-32%. In plasma protein, treatment with Irbesartan increased content of glycation adducts Nε-fructosyl-lysine, AGEs Nε-carboxymethyl-lysine, Nε-carboxyethyl-lysine and pentosidine, and also increased content of oxidation markers N-formylkynurenine and dityrosine. This was attributed to decreased clearance of plasma protein modified by Nε-fructosyl-lysine and oxidative markers through the glomerular filter tightened by Irbesartan treatment. Treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes with Irbesartan decreased urinary excretion of MG-H1, G-H1 and 3-NT, which may result from decreased exposure to these AGEs. This is likely achieved by blocking angiotensin II signalling and related down-regulation of glyoxalase 1 and may contribute to health benefits of Irbesartan therapy.

Implementation of a simple age-based strategy in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: the Polypill approach.

BACKGROUND: A combination of medications that simultaneously reduce several cardiovascular risk factors in people above a specified age, without selection based on risk factor measurement, has been proposed as a simple strategy for reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease and shown to be effective in randomized trials (the Polypill approach). AIMS: To assess acceptance of the Polypill approach and adherence to preventive treatment among individuals taking part in a cardiovascular disease prevention service. METHODS: Daily treatment with simvastatin (40 mg), amlodipine (2.5 mg), bendroflumethiazide (1.25 mg), lisinopril (5 mg) [or candesartan (4 mg) if cough was reported] and folic acid (0.8 mg) was offered, as separate components, to people ≥ 55 years with no history of cardiovascular, renal or liver disease. An audit of adverse effects, adherence and requests for blood pressure and cholesterol measurement was determined by telephone consultation. RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2010, 269 participants started treatment with the Polypill components. Follow-up ranged from 3 to 48 months (mean 20). A total of 222 participants (83%) adhered to treatment, including 30 (11%) who switched from the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (lisinopril) to the angiotensin receptor blocker (candesartan) because of cough. Ten participants (4%) continued to take treatment but stopped taking one or more drugs because of other symptoms, and 37 (14%) stopped all treatment, eight because of adverse effects and 29 for non-medical reasons. No one requested a blood pressure or cholesterol measurement. CONCLUSION: This is the first demonstration of the application of the Polypill approach in practice. The method was accepted and the Polypill components were well tolerated, with good adherence and no demand for information about risk factors.

Comparison of the effects of antihypertensive agents on central blood pressure and arterial stiffness in isolated systolic hypertension.

Isolated systolic hypertension is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease and results primarily from elastic artery stiffening. Although various drug therapies are used to lower peripheral blood pressure (BP) in patients with isolated systolic hypertension, the effects of the 4 major classes of antihypertensive agents on central BP, pulse pressure (PP) amplification, and arterial stiffness in this condition are not clear. Fifty-nine patients over the age of 60 years with untreated isolated systolic hypertension (systolic BP > or =140 mm Hg and diastolic BP

Characterisation of excipient-free nanoporous microparticles (NPMPs) of bendroflumethiazide.

The purpose of this study was to prepare excipient-free porous microparticles of bendroflumethiazide by spray drying and to characterise the physicochemical properties of the particles produced. Solutions of bendroflumethiazide in ethanol/water, ethanol/water/ammonium carbonate or methanol/water/ammonium carbonate were spray dried using a laboratory spray dryer. Spray dried products were characterised by scanning electron microscopy, X-ray powder diffraction, differential scanning calorimetry, FTIR, laser diffraction particle sizing and density measurement. Nanoporous microparticles (NPMPs) were prepared from the alcoholic solutions containing ammonium carbonate. NPMPs were amorphous in nature, had median particles sizes less than 3 microm and densities that were significantly reduced compared to non-porous spray dried bendroflumethiazide powder. The novel process may be used to produce excipient-free amorphous microparticles with desirable physical properties such as amorphous solid state, porosity and low bulk density. This new engineering technology has applications in the design of other therapeutic agents such as those used in pulmonary delivery.

Comparison of effects of combined ACE inhibitor and low-dose thiazide diuretic with ACE inhibitor alone on insulin action in patients with hypertension and Type 2 diabetes: a double-blind crossover study.

AIMS: To establish the safety in terms of insulin sensitivity of a low dose thiazide/ACE inhibitor combination. METHODS: We examined the effects on insulin sensitivity of captopril either alone or in combination with low-dose bendroflumethiazide (1.25 mg) in 15 hypertensive Type 2 diabetic patients. Insulin action was assessed using an isoglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp in a double-blind, randomised, crossover study after a 6-week placebo run-in and following two 12-week treatment periods with captopril (C) (100 mg) alone or in combination with bendroflumethiazide (CB) (1.25 mg). RESULTS: Blood pressure was lower following CB compare to C (138/83 vs. 144/85 mmHg; P < 0.05) and both were lower than baseline (153/92 mmHg; P < 0.01). CB resulted in a significant increase in fasting plasma glucose compared to C (9.6 +/- 2.6 vs. 8.5 +/- 1.6 mmol/l; P < 0.05). Exogenous glucose infusion rates required to maintain isoglycaemia during hyperinsulinaemia were lower after CB compared to C (25.1 +/- 13.3 vs. 34.2 +/- 16.8 micromol/kg/min; P < 0.01) as were isotopically determined glucose utilisation rates (29.0 +/- 12.4 vs. 36.6 +/- 17.3 micromol/kg/min; P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in fasting endogenous glucose production between treatments (CB 9.3 +/- 3.3 vs. C 8.6 +/- 1.6 micromol/kg/min), nor between suppression following insulin (CB 4.0 +/- 2.1 vs. C 4.3 +/- 3.1 micromol/kg/min). CONCLUSIONS: Combination of low-dose bendroflumethiazide with captopril lowered blood pressure but resulted in deleterious effects on insulin action compared to captopril alone.

Low-dose quadruple antihypertensive combination: more efficacious than individual agents--a preliminary report.

Increasingly combined antihypertensive agents are being used in practice to enhance control and improve compliance. To determine whether a capsule containing a quarter of the standard dose of 4 antihypertensive agents has greater efficacy than the standard dose of each individually, we prospectively randomized 108 untreated white hypertensive patients (55% male) aged 50+/-1 years (mean+/-SEM), with mean blood pressure 160+/-1/96+/-1 mm Hg. Patients received amlodipine (5 mg; n=22), atenolol (50 mg; n=20), bendroflumethiazide (2.5 mg; n=22), captopril (50 mg twice daily; n=22) or a capsule containing each of the 4 above at one-quarter dosage (n=22) in a parallel group design for 4 weeks. Blood pressure was measured using a semiautomated device (Omron 705), and the reduction in mean arterial pressure with the combined preparation was compared with that of the individual components. Statistical analysis used ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer honestly significant difference for multiple comparisons. The reduction in mean arterial pressure with the combination (19+/-2 mm Hg) was significantly greater than that with individual agents amlodipine (10+/-2 mm Hg; P<0.005), atenolol (10+/-2 mm Hg; P<0.005), bendroflumethiazide (6+/-1 mm Hg; P<0.005), and captopril (11+/-1 mm Hg; P<0.01). In addition, the percentage reduction in systolic (18+/-1 mm Hg; P<0.005) and diastolic (17+/-2 mm Hg; P=0.06) blood pressure was greater with the combination. More patients achieved a blood pressure of <140/90 mm Hg with the combination (60%) than any individual drug (15% to 45%; P<0.05). A low-dose combination of 4 agents representing 4 classes of standard antihypertensive agents was more efficacious than a standard single dose of each agent individually.

Efficacy and safety of 24 weeks of therapy with bendroflumethiazide 1.25 mg/day or 2.5 mg/day and potassium chloride compared with enalapril 10 mg/day and amlodipine 5 mg/day in patients with mild to moderate primary hypertension : a multicentre, randomised, open study.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of therapy with low-dose bendroflumethiazide 1.25 mg/day or 2.5 mg/day and potassium chloride was compared with that of enalapril 10 mg/day and amlodipine 5 mg/day in patients with mild to moderate primary hypertension. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicentre study in general practice with patients randomised in a double-blind fashion and on open-label treatment. After a washout phase that lasted 4-6 weeks, 312 patients with a diastolic blood pressure of between 100 and 115 mm Hg were randomised in a double-blind fashion to treatment with either bendroflumethiazide 1.25 mg/day and potassium chloride (n = 117), bendroflumethiazide 2.5 mg/day and potassium chloride (n = 60), amlodipine 5 mg/day (n = 61) or enalapril 10 mg/day (n = 60), all given once daily (numbers in parentheses indicate the intention-to-treat population, with a total of 298 patients). The primary efficacy parameter was the reduction in diastolic blood pressure. Effects on systolic blood pressure, heart rate, biochemical variables, adverse events and quality of life were studied as secondary efficacy parameters. RESULTS: All treatments reduced diastolic blood pressure significantly; reductions were as follows: 6.8 mm Hg with bendroflumethiazide 1.25 mg/day, 9.1 mm Hg with bendroflumethiazide 2.5 mg/day, 10.8 mm Hg with amlodipine 5 mg/day and 6.8 mm Hg with enalapril 10 mg/day. The reduction in diastolic blood pressure on amlodipine was significantly greater than on bendroflumethiazide 1.25 mg/day and enalapril 10 mg/day (p = 0.013). The percentage of patients achieving a diastolic blood pressure of < 95 mm Hg was 34% (SD 4.4) with bendroflumethiazide 1.25 mg/day, 48% (SD 6.5) with bendroflumethiazide 2.5 mg/day (p = 0.075 vs bendroflumethiazide 1.25 mg/day), 57% (SD 6.3) with amlodipine 5 mg/day (p = 0.004 vs bendroflumethiazide 1.25 mg/day) and 41% (SD 6.4) with enalapril 10 mg/day (p = 0.41 vs bendroflumethiazide 1.25 mg/day) [mean reductions]. The effect on systolic blood pressure was similar with all treatments. No clinically significant changes occurred in heart rate, serum potassium, blood glucose, serum urate or serum cholesterol levels. The incidences of adverse events were similar in the low-dose bendroflumethiazide groups, with significantly higher incidences in the enalapril and amlodipine groups. Quality of life was similar in the different treatment groups, but the study had limited power to detect any difference in this parameter. CONCLUSION: The present study has confirmed, in a general practice population, that low-dose bendroflumethiazide (bendroflumethiazide 1.25-2.5 mg/day) in combination with potassium chloride is a well tolerated and efficacious first-line treatment for patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.

Does aldosterone-to-renin ratio predict the antihypertensive effect of the aldosterone antagonist spironolactone?

BACKGROUND: The recognition that some 10% to 15% of the hypertensive population may have aldosterone excess has increased the frequency of measurement of the aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) and the use of aldosterone antagonists. Whether this ratio will predict the blood pressure (BP) response to spironolactone is not clear. METHODS: We correlated the BP response to spironolactone 50 mg/day to baseline ARR in 69 hypertensive patients (mean [+/-SD] age 57 +/- 2 years, 65% male), consisting of 39 subjects with long-standing hypertension (4.0 +/- 0.2 years) whose hypertension was uncontrolled on at least three antihypertensive medications and 30 previously untreated patients who were randomized in a cross-over design to receive either spironolactone 50 mg/day or bendroflumethiazide 2.5 mg/day for 4 weeks. RESULTS: After 4 weeks of spironolactone, BP in patients with never-treated hypertension was reduced by 18 +/- 3 / 11 +/- 1 mm Hg. There was a highly significant correlation between log ARR and the fall in systolic BP (r = 0.69, P < .001) and diastolic BP (r = 0.45, P < .05). Nine of ten patients with low renin activity (< or =0.5 ng/mL/h) showed a >20-mm Hg fall in systolic BP. No such correlations were seen when BP was reduced by bendroflumethazide 2.5 mg. For patients with resistant hypertension, despite a BP reduction of 28 +/- 3 / 13 +/- 2 mm Hg after 14 weeks of spironolactone, there was no relationship between the reduction in BP and the ARR; however, subjects with pretreatment potassium <4.0 mmol/L had a greater response than those with levels > or =4.0 mmol/L (34 +/- 3 / 16 +/- 2 v 20 +/- 6 / 8 +/- 3 mm Hg, P < .05) CONCLUSIONS: Based on the study results, ARR and low renin activity may predict the response to spironolactone in never-treated hypertensive patients but not in patients taking antihypertensive drugs, possibly because of the effect of these agents on ARR. In such patients a trial of spironolactone is required to assess the BP response.

Cyclooxygenase inhibition causes marked impairment of renal function in elderly subjects treated with diuretics and ACE-inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors is known to cause an initial reduction in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in patients with congestive heart failure. The long-term beneficial effects of ACE-inhibitors in these patients can be counteracted by cyclooxygenase-inhibitors. AIMS: To quantify the negative renal effects of the cyclooxygenase-inhibitor diclofenac in elderly healthy subjects and to assess how treatment with an ACE-inhibitor, after activation of the renin-angiotensin system, influences these renal effects. METHODS: Fourteen elderly, healthy subjects received oral diclofenac and placebo in a double-blind cross-over fashion. The study was divided in two parts; in part one, subjects received no pre-treatment and in part two, the subjects were given pre-treatment with bendroflumethiazide and enalapril in order to activate the renin-angiotensin system. RESULTS: Diclofenac induced significant (p<0.05) decreases in GFR, urine flow, excretion rates of sodium and potassium, electrolyte clearance, osmolality clearance and free water clearance both with and without renin-angiotensin system activation. Least square means (95% CI) of all observations during the first 6 h after dosing showed that diclofenac caused a reduction in GFR from 71 (64-78) to 59 (52-66) ml/min. After pre-treatment, diclofenac further reduced GFR from 60 (52-67) to 48 (40-55) ml/min. After diclofenac administration, urine flow fell from 7.4 (6.4-8.3) to 5.1 (4.2-6.1) ml/min, after pre-treatment, diclofenac gave a further reduction from 4.1 (3.1-5.1) to 2.2 (1.3-3.2) ml/min. More than half of the reductions were caused by the pre-treatment. CONCLUSION: Renal function in elderly, healthy subjects is impaired after acute intake of diclofenac. This impairment is observed both with and without activation of the renin-angiotensin system and ACE-inhibitor treatment but is more pronounced after pre-treatment.

Prevention of cardiovascular events with an antihypertensive regimen of amlodipine adding perindopril as required versus atenolol adding bendroflumethiazide as required, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT-BPLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The apparent shortfall in prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD) noted in early hypertension trials has been attributed to disadvantages of the diuretics and beta blockers used. For a given reduction in blood pressure, some suggested that newer agents would confer advantages over diuretics and beta blockers. Our aim, therefore, was to compare the effect on non-fatal myocardial infarction and fatal CHD of combinations of atenolol with a thiazide versus amlodipine with perindopril. METHODS: We did a multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial in 19 257 patients with hypertension who were aged 40-79 years and had at least three other cardiovascular risk factors. Patients were assigned either amlodipine 5-10 mg adding perindopril 4-8 mg as required (amlodipine-based regimen; n=9639) or atenolol 50-100 mg adding bendroflumethiazide 1.25-2.5 mg and potassium as required (atenolol-based regimen; n=9618). Our primary endpoint was non-fatal myocardial infarction (including silent myocardial infarction) and fatal CHD. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: The study was stopped prematurely after 5.5 years' median follow-up and accumulated in total 106 153 patient-years of observation. Though not significant, compared with the atenolol-based regimen, fewer individuals on the amlodipine-based regimen had a primary endpoint (429 vs 474; unadjusted HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.79-1.02, p=0.1052), fatal and non-fatal stroke (327 vs 422; 0.77, 0.66-0.89, p=0.0003), total cardiovascular events and procedures (1362 vs 1602; 0.84, 0.78-0.90, p<0.0001), and all-cause mortality (738 vs 820; 0.89, 0.81-0.99, p=0.025). The incidence of developing diabetes was less on the amlodipine-based regimen (567 vs 799; 0.70, 0.63-0.78, p<0.0001). INTERPRETATION: The amlodipine-based regimen prevented more major cardiovascular events and induced less diabetes than the atenolol-based regimen. On the basis of previous trial evidence, these effects might not be entirely explained by better control of blood pressure, and this issue is addressed in the accompanying article. Nevertheless, the results have implications with respect to optimum combinations of antihypertensive agents.

[Old or new antihypertensives--which are better?]. / Differenzialtherapie mit alten und neuen Antihypertensiva. In der Praxis brauchen Sie alle fünf.

Some of the reported findings of numerous studies on the treatment of hypertension are still giving rise to heated discussions. The result is conflicting recommendations and uncertainty among care-providing physicians. Today, the substances from the group of more recent hypertensive agents (calcium antagonists, ACE-inhibitors and angiotensin 1 receptor blockers) together with the classical agents (diuretics and beta blockers) are recognized as equally justifiable as the five agents of first choice in the treatment of uncomplicated hypertension. If, however, accompanying diseases are present, the choice of primary medication depends on the respective risk (diabetes, etc.) of the individual patient. In many cases, combination treatment should be considered from the very beginning.

Bendrofluazide fails to reduce elevated blood pressure levels in the immediate post-stroke period.

INTRODUCTION: Blood pressure (BP) levels, beat-to-beat blood pressure variability, dynamic cerebral autoregulation and cardiac baroreceptor sensitivity are frequently abnormal following acute stroke and are associated with an adverse short- and long-term prognosis. Thiazide diuretics are effective antihypertensive agents in preventing primary and secondary stroke, but their hypotensive and cerebral autoregulatory effects in the immediate post-stroke period have not been studied. METHODS: Thirty-seven hypertensive neuroradiologically proven ischaemic stroke patients were randomized in a double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel group study to bendrofluazide 2.5 mg daily or matching placebo, within 96 h of stroke onset, for a 7-day period. Casual and non-invasive beat-to-beat arterial BP levels, cerebral blood flow velocity, ECG and transcutaneous carbon dioxide levels were measured within 70 +/- 20 h of cerebral infarction and again 7 days later. Dynamic cerebral autoregulatory indices, pulse interval, BP variability and cardiac baroreceptor sensitivity were also calculated. RESULTS: Small, non-significant falls were seen in casual and beat-to-beat BP levels over the 7-day period in both active and placebo-treated patients with no differences between treatments. No significant changes were seen in dynamic cerebral autoregulation or in cardiac baroreceptor sensitivity during the follow-up in either group. CONCLUSION: Following acute ischaemic stroke, the standard dose of bendrofluazide at 2.5 mg daily in this study sample did not lower systemic BP levels over the subsequent 7-day period. There was no evidence that bendrofluazide significantly altered cerebral autoregulation or improved cardiac baroreceptor sensitivity post-ictus. Bendrofluazide appears to be an ineffective hypotensive agent at the standard dosage in the initial post-stroke period.